<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Thomson Park</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thomsonpark.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thomsonpark.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Revolutionary War Battle Site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 22:01:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Colonel  &quot;Danger&quot; Thomson by dougmac1776</title>
		<link>http://thomsonpark.wordpress.com/colonel-william-danger-thomson-1727-1796/#comment-2812</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dougmac1776]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 22:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougmac2020.wordpress.com/#comment-2812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[See our best information on this page http://thomsonpark.wordpress.com/british-and-american-forces-at-breach-inlet/.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See our best information on this page <a href="http://thomsonpark.wordpress.com/british-and-american-forces-at-breach-inlet/" rel="nofollow">http://thomsonpark.wordpress.com/british-and-american-forces-at-breach-inlet/</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Colonel  &quot;Danger&quot; Thomson by Margaret Arthur</title>
		<link>http://thomsonpark.wordpress.com/colonel-william-danger-thomson-1727-1796/#comment-2810</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Margaret Arthur]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 20:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougmac2020.wordpress.com/#comment-2810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Where might one find a list of those who served with Thomson in the defense of Charleston? Thank you in advance.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where might one find a list of those who served with Thomson in the defense of Charleston? Thank you in advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Colonel  &quot;Danger&quot; Thomson by Tom Haskell</title>
		<link>http://thomsonpark.wordpress.com/colonel-william-danger-thomson-1727-1796/#comment-2714</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Haskell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 02:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougmac2020.wordpress.com/#comment-2714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please accept my tardy thank you for your correction above.  Are you the Jeff Reid of the Calhoun County Museum?  Are there additional exhibits for William Thomson there?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please accept my tardy thank you for your correction above.  Are you the Jeff Reid of the Calhoun County Museum?  Are there additional exhibits for William Thomson there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Colonel  &quot;Danger&quot; Thomson by Daniel Bagby</title>
		<link>http://thomsonpark.wordpress.com/colonel-william-danger-thomson-1727-1796/#comment-2708</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Bagby]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 15:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougmac2020.wordpress.com/#comment-2708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a superior source of information.  I had an ancestor, Eleazer Gore, who was with Thomson&#039;s Rgt at the battle.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a superior source of information.  I had an ancestor, Eleazer Gore, who was with Thomson&#8217;s Rgt at the battle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Project Information by Samantha Thompson</title>
		<link>http://thomsonpark.wordpress.com/project-updates/#comment-1571</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Samantha Thompson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2012 00:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougmac2020.wordpress.com/#comment-1571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is so cool! I will definitely be visiting the next time I am in Charleston.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is so cool! I will definitely be visiting the next time I am in Charleston.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Colonel  &quot;Danger&quot; Thomson by Heyward Horton</title>
		<link>http://thomsonpark.wordpress.com/colonel-william-danger-thomson-1727-1796/#comment-1377</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heyward Horton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 19:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougmac2020.wordpress.com/#comment-1377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am an admirer of our Revolutionary War heros, of whom Thomson was one.  I once belonged to a hunt club, at Ft. Motte, that included Belleville Plantation.  The club split about 10 years ago, and I went with the Lang Syne Plantation side.  However, hunting the old graveyard surrounds was a favorite for me, and I often stopped by to pay my respects to Old Danger.  I was blessed with good hunting, and took a few deer &amp; hogs and a handful of turkeys in the graveyard vicinity.  The Gressettes grow timber on Belleville and the timber encroachment has caused some damage to the site.  Very recently, SCDoT has conducted a mining operation &amp; equipment staging area adjacent to Hwy 601 for the construction of a new bridge across the Congaree River.  It appears that this open area is close to the grave site and may provide easier access than through the forest roads.
By the way, happy Carolina Day!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am an admirer of our Revolutionary War heros, of whom Thomson was one.  I once belonged to a hunt club, at Ft. Motte, that included Belleville Plantation.  The club split about 10 years ago, and I went with the Lang Syne Plantation side.  However, hunting the old graveyard surrounds was a favorite for me, and I often stopped by to pay my respects to Old Danger.  I was blessed with good hunting, and took a few deer &amp; hogs and a handful of turkeys in the graveyard vicinity.  The Gressettes grow timber on Belleville and the timber encroachment has caused some damage to the site.  Very recently, SCDoT has conducted a mining operation &amp; equipment staging area adjacent to Hwy 601 for the construction of a new bridge across the Congaree River.  It appears that this open area is close to the grave site and may provide easier access than through the forest roads.<br />
By the way, happy Carolina Day!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Forces at Breach Inlet by Fred Kane</title>
		<link>http://thomsonpark.wordpress.com/british-and-american-forces-at-breach-inlet/#comment-1085</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fred Kane]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 19:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougmac2020.wordpress.com/#comment-1085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great work Doug.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great work Doug.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wayside Exhibits by Share Your Feedback on the New Thompson Park at Breach Inlet This Weekend, March 16 &#8211; 18 &#124; The Island Eye News</title>
		<link>http://thomsonpark.wordpress.com/wayside-exhibits/#comment-817</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Share Your Feedback on the New Thompson Park at Breach Inlet This Weekend, March 16 &#8211; 18 &#124; The Island Eye News]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomsonpark.wordpress.com/#comment-817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] We have reworked the exhibit to incorporate input from previous drafts. This exhibit provides context for the three original exhibits which describe the battle. You can see those exhibits and get more information at http://thomsonpark.wordpress.com/wayside-exhibits. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We have reworked the exhibit to incorporate input from previous drafts. This exhibit provides context for the three original exhibits which describe the battle. You can see those exhibits and get more information at <a href="http://thomsonpark.wordpress.com/wayside-exhibits" rel="nofollow">http://thomsonpark.wordpress.com/wayside-exhibits</a>. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Points to Ponder by Chip Bragg</title>
		<link>http://thomsonpark.wordpress.com/points-to-ponder/#comment-811</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chip Bragg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 20:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomsonpark.wordpress.com/#comment-811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have found Moultrie&#039;s memoirs to be very trustworthy despite the long lapse between the occurrence of the actual events and the publication of his books. Much of the space he devoted to reproducing documents from his extensive collection of personal papers. In other parts, where he is writing narrative, I have found that he certainly had supporting documentation in his possession. Here is a case in point: on pages 355-56 of volume 2 he relates the touching scene of the welcome he received from his slaves when he returned home to his plantation just before the end of the war. Addressing the account, Robert Olwell who wrote the book Masters, Slaves &amp; Subjects suggested that nostalgia clouded Moultrie’s twenty-year-old recollection (274–75, 275 n. 11). Not so! Not at all! I found  a contemporaneous letter from Moultrie to his wife dated August 1782 that relates the story in far more detail than Moultrie provided in his books. Point is, he was not just writing from memory. Pardon me from digressing fro the subject of Thomson&#039;s Park..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have found Moultrie&#8217;s memoirs to be very trustworthy despite the long lapse between the occurrence of the actual events and the publication of his books. Much of the space he devoted to reproducing documents from his extensive collection of personal papers. In other parts, where he is writing narrative, I have found that he certainly had supporting documentation in his possession. Here is a case in point: on pages 355-56 of volume 2 he relates the touching scene of the welcome he received from his slaves when he returned home to his plantation just before the end of the war. Addressing the account, Robert Olwell who wrote the book Masters, Slaves &amp; Subjects suggested that nostalgia clouded Moultrie’s twenty-year-old recollection (274–75, 275 n. 11). Not so! Not at all! I found  a contemporaneous letter from Moultrie to his wife dated August 1782 that relates the story in far more detail than Moultrie provided in his books. Point is, he was not just writing from memory. Pardon me from digressing fro the subject of Thomson&#8217;s Park..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wayside Exhibits by dougmac1776</title>
		<link>http://thomsonpark.wordpress.com/wayside-exhibits/#comment-463</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dougmac1776]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2011 23:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomsonpark.wordpress.com/#comment-463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been hoping someone else would comment on this interesting topic. We first addressed it while working on the three original exhibits. I don’t think there was a clear right way to spell the city&#039;s name in the Revolutionary Era. You could make a case for any of several spellings. We settled on Charles Town for the exhibits because that spelling occurred frequently in primary accounts from 1776, and we’re sticking with it in the final exhibit for consistency.  

The spelling morphed from the original Charles Town(e) to the now-standard Charleston over more than a century. The Revolution years were a transitional time -- I have seen it written every which way in accounts from the 1770s and 1780s.  While Charles Town and Charlestown were most common in the period, Charles Towne still appeared occasionally and Charleston was already in use.  Charlestown and Charleston seem to have become more prevalent as the war progressed.  I suspect the official naming reflected the most common usage when the city was incorporated in 1783.  The issue is complicated by the lack of standards and well-intentioned later authors “clarifying” the original text to make the reading easier for their audiences.  I recall seeing some histories written in the 19th Century using Charleston without regard to the original language in quotations.

Here are some of the various usages in the Revolutionary era: A London newspaper spelled it Charles Town in 1776 and a Charleston newspaper spelled it Charles-Town in 1777.  (The dash also appeared frequently in South-Carolina.) The local almanac was an early adopter, spelling it Charleston in 1776.  A quick check of some histories written by participants reveals that Ramsay (American doctor and politician) used Charleston in 1785; Stedman (British officer) used Charlestown in 1794; Moultrie (American officer and politician) and Drayton (American politician) used Charlestown in 1802 and 1821.  Maps from the 1770s and 1780s most commonly used Charlestown or Charles Town.  Richard Hutson, who was in the patriot militia during the Battle of Sullivan’s Island, became the first intendant (mayor) of Charleston in 1783.  He spelled it Charles Town in letters written during and after the battle of Sullivan&#039;s Island in 1776.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been hoping someone else would comment on this interesting topic. We first addressed it while working on the three original exhibits. I don’t think there was a clear right way to spell the city&#8217;s name in the Revolutionary Era. You could make a case for any of several spellings. We settled on Charles Town for the exhibits because that spelling occurred frequently in primary accounts from 1776, and we’re sticking with it in the final exhibit for consistency.  </p>
<p>The spelling morphed from the original Charles Town(e) to the now-standard Charleston over more than a century. The Revolution years were a transitional time &#8212; I have seen it written every which way in accounts from the 1770s and 1780s.  While Charles Town and Charlestown were most common in the period, Charles Towne still appeared occasionally and Charleston was already in use.  Charlestown and Charleston seem to have become more prevalent as the war progressed.  I suspect the official naming reflected the most common usage when the city was incorporated in 1783.  The issue is complicated by the lack of standards and well-intentioned later authors “clarifying” the original text to make the reading easier for their audiences.  I recall seeing some histories written in the 19th Century using Charleston without regard to the original language in quotations.</p>
<p>Here are some of the various usages in the Revolutionary era: A London newspaper spelled it Charles Town in 1776 and a Charleston newspaper spelled it Charles-Town in 1777.  (The dash also appeared frequently in South-Carolina.) The local almanac was an early adopter, spelling it Charleston in 1776.  A quick check of some histories written by participants reveals that Ramsay (American doctor and politician) used Charleston in 1785; Stedman (British officer) used Charlestown in 1794; Moultrie (American officer and politician) and Drayton (American politician) used Charlestown in 1802 and 1821.  Maps from the 1770s and 1780s most commonly used Charlestown or Charles Town.  Richard Hutson, who was in the patriot militia during the Battle of Sullivan’s Island, became the first intendant (mayor) of Charleston in 1783.  He spelled it Charles Town in letters written during and after the battle of Sullivan&#8217;s Island in 1776.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
